Coin Center: State Bank Supervisors Proposal Good for Attorney, Bad for Customers and Innovators

legislature2

The Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) released its model structure for states to utilize in creating policies and made it clear it wants to see state governments take a proactive and rigorous method to licensing and monitoring “virtual currencies” companies.

The Conference report said:

“… CSBS concluded that activities including third-party control of virtual currency, including for the functions of transmitting, exchanging, holding, or otherwise controlling virtual currency, should be subject to state licensure and supervision.”

Coin Center, a Washington based-advocacy group for digital currencies, voiced their objections, stating the conference started with excellent objectives but didn’t follow up in this final report.

Peter Van Valkenburgh, Coin Center Director of Research study, said:

“Sadly, we’ve strong issues about the ambiguity of the language they have actually chosen in this last draft: ambiguity that could encumber lots of innovative however non-custodial companies, whom CSBS most likely never meant to be controlled at all.”

Coin Center has actually taken a well balanced strategy to policy in the past, for instance, dealing with and supporting California’s digital currencies regulations.

Van Valkenburgh included:

We prompt any state regulators who are encountering these problems to search for a clearer, more justiciable requirement of ‘‘ covered activities’…”

In their report, the bank managers call for an iron grip on companies, who must get a license and show state regulators the details of their business strategy.

In addition, Coin Center keeps in mind, the proposed structure covers too wide a scope and consists of businesses that do not directly hold a consumer’s funds.

“Covered activities” in the report include: “Solutions that help with the third-party exchange, storage, and/or transmission of virtual currency (e.g. purses, vaults, stands, merchant-acquirers, and payment processors.)”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Rainey Reitman is currently evaluating the proposal, but notes it is a throwback to a various age:

“At the end of the day, cryptocurrencies are distributed software application jobs that can be accessed from throughout the world. They should not be managed like brick-and-mortar businesses that serve a certain locality or community.”

The Bank Supervisors justify their propositions by stating:

“Licensing and guidance serve as a system for protecting customers, ensuring system stability, securing market development, and assisting law enforcement …”

The State Bank Supervisors can make recommendations in a design structure, and despite the truth that the company carries some weight in the banking community, state federal governments are not required by law to embrace these propositions.

The post Coin Center: State Bank Supervisors Proposition Helpful for Lawyers, Bad for Customers and Innovators appeared initially on Bitcoin Magazine.


Bitcoin Magazine

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

I agree to these terms.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top