European Banking Authority Proposes Virtual Currency-Specific Regulatory Body

The European Banking Authority (EBA)has encouraged the European Commission to establish a regulatory regime particular to virtual currencies such as bitcoin. Talking about the commission’s proposition to amend the existing European anti-money laundering instruction, the EBA expresses the viewpoint that, in the long term, oversight of digital currencies must not fall under routine anti-money laundering provisions, but rather under a specialized EU body.In a reaction to the commission published by the EBA last month, the banking authority recommends that the existing anti-money laundering instruction is “currently not suitable for alleviating all the threats developing from [virtual currency] transactions. Instead, a separate regulative regime, or more significant modifications […] would be needed.”

Effect on Bitcoin Addresses and Miners

In July 2016, the European Commission published a draft regulation, proposing to extend stringent anti-money laundering (AML) regulations and “countering the funding of terrorism” (CFT) determines to Bitcoin company. Specifically, the directive would use to virtual currency exchange services and custodial wallet providers.The draft regulation

also hinted that more regulation might be required in the future to maybe include Bitcoin address-ownership. The EBA’s reaction suggests contract with that assessment and recommends that mining ought to be subject to oversight also, stating:”[ Virtual currencies]. incur additional, technology-specific dangers that make them distinct from conventional fiat currencies that remain in the scope of [the existing anti-money laundering instruction] So-called ’51 percent attacks,’ for example, are one such threat, [making up] a circumstance in which a swimming pool of miners achieves 51 percent of the computational power with which systems of a particular [virtual currency] scheme are mined, which in turn enables that swimming pool to block transactions. “The banking authority therefore says that a change to the present anti-money laundering instruction may not be adequate in the longer term. It suggests in favor of the installation of an unique regulative body for virtual currencies in the future.EU Directive Although the EBA advises that the commission ought to develop a regulative program specific to virtual currencies, it does normally support the proposed amendment to the existing anti-money laundering instruction. As the facility of a brand-new regulatory program would take a significant quantity of time, the amendment proposal acts as a great intermediary action. “Such a regulative routine […] would require numerous years to establish, speak with, finalise and shift, and is therefore not a choice, given the brief time frame within which the Commission was asked to establish its propositions, “writes the EBA.”It may therefore be suggested for the Commission and co-legislators to initiate as quickly as possible the comprehensive analysis that is needed for examining which, if any, regulatory regime would be most suitable for [virtual currency] deals.”The EBA does, nevertheless, recommend that the draft directive needs some refinement. In particular, the banking authority points out that both the European authorities as well as digital currency business running in Europe must be well-prepared to deal with brand-new legislation. This may need some extra time prior to the brand-new instruction can applied.According to the EBA:”[ I] n order for these modifications to minimize the threat of virtual currencies being abused for money laundering or terrorist financing purposes, the Commission and co-legislators must make sure that competent authorities have the suitable tools at their disposal to ensure the reliable guidance of [custodial wallet companies ‘] and [virtual currency exchange platforms’] compliance with their AML/CFT commitments.”The new regulation is scheduled to be enforced by January 1, 2017, however the EBA thinks that June 26, 2017, would be a more practical goal.Sharing Data The EBA is likewise concerned about the global qualities of virtual currencies such as bitcoin.An EU instruction is itself not a law, however rather functions as a guideline for specific member states to draft nationwide laws. This indicates that the resulting laws in any one member state may differ somewhat from the others.And since digital currencies survive on the internet, and many company– like digital currency exchanges and custodial wallet providers– provide their services on the internet too, state laws are easily circumvented, the EBA warns.The EBA therefore suggests that different European member states will need to work carefully together, noting that the risks can be tackled within all of the political union just if the relevant firms in the various countries cooperate.According to the EBA:”It is […] important that proficient authorities from different member states have the ability to liaise and exchange details in relation to the operation of [

virtual currency exchange platforms] and [custodial wallet providers] on their territory. […] The EBA for that reason considers that the EU Commission and co-legislators should for that reason present further modifications [

…] to guarantee that skilled authorities responsible for the AML/CFT supervision […] have gateways in place to exchange appropriate information with one another. “For specific information and more recommendations by the EBA on the EU instruction draft proposal, read the full viewpoint as released by the banking authority.The post European Banking Authority Proposes Virtual Currency-Specific Regulatory Body appeared initially on Bitcoin Magazine. Bitcoin Publication

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

I agree to these terms.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top